Dr Alison Ross
- PhD (Philosophy, University of Sydney), BA (Philosophy Hons) (Macquarie University)
- Senior Lecturer in Critical Theory
- Contact details
- Full Curriculum Vitae
(PDF)

Alison Ross is Senior Lecturer in Critical Theory. She has a BA (Hons) in Philosophy from Macquarie University and a PhD in Philosophy from the University of Sydney. Prior to commencing her appointment at Monash in 2001 she held positions as Assistant Lecturer (University of Sydney, 1997) and Lecturer (Australian National University, 1998-2000) in Philosophy. She specialises in Aesthetics and European Philosophy. She is on the Editorial Board of the journal ‘Derrida Today’ (EUP) and is the Aesthetics Editor for the journal ‘Critical Horizons’ (Acumen). At Monash, she is a member of the Research Unit in European Philosophy (RUEP).
Research
My main research interests are in Kantian and post-Kantian Aesthetics. I have studied the different ways that the conception of aesthetics in the Kantian tradition provides the grammar for conceptions of ontology and social criticism in European philosophy. From Kant comes the influential view of aesthetics as the finding of orientating meanings in the reflection on sensuous forms. In my published work I have looked at the diverse ways that the cogency of the activity of criticism (especially in Marxist and post-Marxist political theory) as well as the articulation of ontological theses (Heidegger, Nancy) can be critically located in the schema and concerns of this aesthetic tradition.
My current research project excavates and analyses the role aesthetic experience plays in moral persuasion. This project (funded by the Australian Research Council) is being undertaken with Professor Andrew Benjamin (Monash) and Professor Krzyzstof Ziarek (State University of New York, at Buffalo, USA).
The working hypothesis of this project is that aesthetic experience (i.e., the reflection on sensuous forms) has a determining role in the process of persuasion to moral standpoints, these latter understood in the broad sense of reflective self-determinations. The evidence for this hypothesis can be found in canonical texts in the history of modern moral philosophy, although its presence there often contradicts the stated aims of moral theories, such as Kant’s. In more general terms, I believe that this type of reasoning can also be seen in the attachment people have to certain intellectual positions and traditions as much as it can be used to explain the attraction of counter-cultural lifestyles and activist networks. This project is an interdisciplinary one, which draws on work in sociology (Bourdieu and Luhmann), philosophy (Kant, Nietzsche and Foucault) as well as aspects of the modern literary canon (Musil, Flaubert, Kleist) and literary theory (Jauss). In particular, the project combines the insights of studies in rhetoric and meaning formation (Blumenberg and Nancy) to forge a new way of considering the elements involved in moral position taking. Recently, I have been working on a series of related articles on the allegorical role that references to theatre and performance play in forging persuasive paradigms for action in contemporary critical theory.
Selected Publications
This book examines the ways that Heidegger, Lacoue-Labarthe and Nancy adopt and reconfigure the Kantian understanding of ‘aesthetic presentation’. In Kant ‘aesthetic presentation’ is understood in a technical sense as a specific mode of experience within a typology of different spheres of experience. This study argues that Heidegger, Lacoue-Labarthe, and Nancy generalize the elements of this specific mode of experience so that the aesthetic attitude and vocabulary used by Kant to describe it are brought to bear on things in general.
This special issue of SAQ examines Agamben’s works Homo Sacer (1995), The Open (2002), and State of Exception (2003). Some contributors use Agamben’s work to examine the history of abortion law in the West, the history of slavery, and women’s rights. Others analyze the connections between Agamben’s work and that of other thinkers, including Alain Badiou, Michel Foucault, Martin Heidegger and Jean-Luc Nancy. Still other essays identify new points of interdisciplinary communication between some of Agamben’s most provocative ideas and popular twentieth-century writing. Overall, this collection aims to provide a critical appraisal of Agamben’s impact in a diverse range of contemporary fields of study.