Review and Remarking of Assessment Procedures
Parent Policy
Review and Remarking of Assessment Policy
Definitions
Review: process through which a mark for an item of assessment is reviewed with the result that it might be adjusted.Remark: process through which an item of assessment is marked by a second marker with the result that the mark awarded by the second marker, even if lower than the original, becomes the final mark for that item.
Review
Prior to Requesting a Review
- Students are responsible for collecting their work and checking their results in a timely fashion when assessment items are returned or made available for return.
- Prior to requesting a mark review for an item of assessment students must discuss the corrected piece of work with either the marker, the tutor, or the unit coordinator. Where students feel unable to approach staff involved with the unit they should contact the undergraduate coordinator (units offered at year levels 1 to 3) or the honours or postgraduate coordinator of the appropriate school.
- If, after discussion, a student is still dissatisfied a request for review of assessment may be lodged.
Responsibility
Students and staffRequesting a Review
- Review requests must be made in writing to the unit coordinator within four weeks after the item of assessment was returned, or made available for return.
- The request must state the reason/s why the review is being requested.
- The original, corrected item of assessment must be included with the review request.
Responsibility
StudentsEligibility
Items of assessment eligible for review are:- essays
- reports
- other written assessment tasks
- failed assessment worth more than 25% of the total result for a unit already second-marked in accordance with Arts policy
- honours theses
- forms of assessment that do not involve significant academic judgement such as multiple-choice tests.
Review Process
- The unit coordinator will assess the request for review and may deny any request deemed to be ineligible, unjustified, or lacking in substance. (Students have the right to appeal the unit coordinator’s decision).
- Once a review request is granted the unit coordinator will appoint a reviewer to reassess the work and provide him/her with the following:
- the reason for the mark review request
- the assessment criteria applicable to the item
- the original piece of assessment showing the mark awarded
- the original marker’s comments on the item
- The final result for the work will be agreed between the original marker and the reviewer who will either:
- confirm the mark originally awarded, or
- increase the mark.
- The reviewer will record his/her name and signature will be recorded on the item of assessment.
- The reviewer is not required to include comments.
- When the reviewed item of assessment is received by the unit coordinator he/she will amend the student’s assessment record if required and return the item of assessment to the student.
Responsibility
Unit coordinators or their delegates and members of staff acting in the role of reviewersRemark
Prior to Requesting a Remark
- Students are responsible for collecting their work and checking their results in a timely fashion when assessment items are returned or made available for return.
- Prior to requesting a remark for an item of assessment students must discuss the corrected piece of work with either the marker, the tutor, or the unit coordinator. Where students feel unable to approach staff involved with the unit they should contact the undergraduate coordinator (units offered at year levels 1 to 3) or the honours or postgraduate coordinator of the appropriate school.
- If, after discussion, a student is still dissatisfied a request for a remark of the item of assessment may be lodged.
Responsibility
Students and staffRequesting a Remark
- Remark requests must be made in writing to the unit coordinator within four weeks after the item of assessment was returned, or made available for return.
- The request must state the reason/s why the remark is being requested.
- The original, corrected item of assessment together with a clean copy, must be included with the remark request.
Responsibility
StudentsEligibility
Items of assessment eligible for remark are:- essays
- reports
- other written assessment tasks
- failed assessment worth more than 25% of the total result for a unit already second-marked in accordance with Arts policy
- assessment tasks that have already been reviewed
- honours theses
- forms of assessment that do not involve significant academic judgement such as multiple-choice tests
Remarking Process
- The unit coordinator will assess the request for a remark and may deny any request deemed to be ineligible, unjustified, or lacking in substance. (Students have the right to appeal the unit coordinator’s decision).
- If the remark request is granted the unit coordinator will appoint an experienced second marker to reassess the work. Once a remark request is granted the unit coordinator will appoint a member of academic staff with appropriate expertise as the second marker and provide him/her with the following:
- clean copy of the item of assessment provided by the student
- the assessment criteria applicable to the item
- The second marker must not be provided with:
- the reason for the remark request
- the corrected item of assessment
- the original mark awarded
- the original marker’s comments on the item
- The final mark for the work will be determined by the second marker notwithstanding the fact that this mark may be lower than the mark originally awarded. The mark awarded by the second marker is not subject to appeal.
- The second marker will record the mark, brief comments to the student, and his/her name and signature on the assessment item.
- The work will then be returned to the unit coordinator who will amend the student’s assessment record and return the item of assessment to the student.