Religion and the project of autonomy
Karl E. Smith, Monash University
Despite his own observations that autonomy is never complete, never once-and-for-all - in short, that autonomy is always relatively more-or-less; or rather, human subjects, institutions and societies can only ever be more-or-less autonomous, and thus more-or-less heteronomous - Castoriadis nevertheless polarizes autonomy and heteronomy. From the polarized perspective, then, he maintains that religion is intrinsically heteronomous, and thus intrinsically antithetical to the project of autonomy. By exploring Taylor's more nuanced understanding of the varieties of religious experience, I argue in this paper that there must be room for a plurality of religious belief within an autonomous society, and that religiosity per se is not incompatible with the project of creating an autonomous society.